【转】Developers Corner: Maximum concurrent connections to the same domain for browsers
Don't be too surprise if you never heard about it as I have seen many web developers missed this crucial point. If you want to have quick figure, this table is from the book PROFESSIONAL Website Performance: OPTIMIZING THE FRONT END AND THE BACK END by Peter Smith
The impact of this limit
Let analyse further on how browser load a webpage. To illustrate, I used Chrome v34 to load one article of my blog (10 ideas to improve Eclipse IDE usability). I prefer Chrome over Firebug because its Developer Tool has the best visualization of page loading. Here is how it looks like
If you focus on the right side of the picture, you can notice that Chrome did a decent job of highlighting different kind of resources with different colours and also manage to capture the timeline of requests.
I tried my best to follow colour convention of Chrome (green for css, purple for images and light blue for AJAX and html). Here is the loading agenda
- Load landing page html
- Load resources for landing pages
- Each comment and follower loaded will trigger avatar loading.
Why browsers have this limit?
You may ask if this limit can have such a great impact to performance, then why don't browser give us a higher limit so that user can enjoy better browsing experience. However, most of the well-known browsers choose not to grant your wish, so that the server will not be overloaded by small amount of browsers and end up classifying user as DDOS attacker.
How to handle this limit?
Fortunately, static resources can be cached and only be downloaded the first time. If it cause slowness, it happen only on first page load and is still tolerable. It is not rare that user will see a page frame loaded first and some pictures slowly appear later later. If you feel that your resources is too fragmented and consume too many requests, there are some tools available that compress and let browser load all resources in single request (UglifyJS, Rhino, YUI Compressor, ...)
Lack of control on Ajax requests cause more severe problem. I would like to share some sample of poor design that cause slowness on page loading.
1. Loading page content with many Ajax requests
This approach is quite popular because it let user feel the progress of page loading and can enjoy some important parts of contents while waiting for the rest of contents to be loaded. There is nothing wrong with this but thing is getting worse when you need more requests to load content that the browser can supply you with. Let say if you create 12 Ajax requests but your browser limit is 6, in best case scenario, you still need to load resources in two batches. It is still not too bad if these 12 requests are not nesting or consecutive executed. Then browser can make use of all available connections to serve the pending requests. Worse situation happen when one request is initiated in another request callback (nested Ajax requests). If this happen, your webpage is slowed down by your design rather than by browser limit.
Few years ago, I took over one project, which is haunted with performance issue. There are many factors that causing the slowness but one concern is too many Ajax requests. I opened browser in debug mode and found more than 6 requests being sent to servers to load different parts of page. Moreover, it is getting worse as the project is delivered by teams from different continents, different time zone. Features are developed in parallel and the developer working on a feature conveniently add server endpoint and Ajax request to let work done. Worrying that the situation is going out of control, we decided to shift the direction of development. The original design is like this:
For most of Ajax requests, the response return JSON model of data. Then, the Knock-out framework will do the binding of html controls with models. We do not face the nested requests issue here but the loading time cannot be faster because of browser limit and many http threads is consumed to serve a single page load. One more problem is the lack of caching. The page contents are pretty static with minimal customization on some parts of webpages.
After consideration, we decided to do a reset to the number of requests by generating page contents in one page. However, if you do not do it properly, it may become like this:
This is even worse than original design. It is more or less equal to having the limit of 1 connection to server and all the requests are handled one by one.
The proper way to achieve similar performance use Aysnc Programming
Each promise can be executed in a separate thread (not http thread) and the response is returned when all the promises are completed. We also apply caching to all of the services to ensure the service to return quickly. With the new design, the page response is faster and server capacity is improved as well.
2. Fail to manage the request queue
I have worked on a web application that make more than 10 Ajax requests when user change value of a first level combo box. Imagine what happen if user change the value of the combo box 10 times consecutively without any break in between? There will be 100 Ajax requests go to request queue and your page seem hanging for a few minutes. This is an intermittent issue because it only happen if user manage to create Ajax requests faster than the browser can handle.
The solution is simple, you have two options here. For the first option, forget about rich client application, refreshing the whole page to load new contents. To persist the value of the combo box, store it as a hash attached to the current URL address. In this case, browser will clear up the queue. The second option is even simpler, block user from making change to combo box if the queue is not yet cleared. To avoid bad experience, you can show the loading bar while disabling the combo box.
3. Nesting of Ajax requests
I have never seen a business requirement for nesting Ajax request. Most of the time I saw nesting request, it was design mistake. For example, if you are a lazy developer and you need to load flags for every country in the world, sorting by continent. Disaster happen when you decide to write code this way:
- Load the continent list
- For each continent, loading countries